When I called Robin Wesley Causey and demanded that he remove my mother’s image from his @embryriddlealum Twitter account, he hung up on me. I tried calling back, and the phone just rang.
That is not the story Causey and his wife, Mary Frances, shared with the Prescott Justice Court, which issued an “Injunction Against Harassment” against me on May 1.
Let’s review the papers I got from Yavapai County. Then, I will contact a lawyer.
WHAT? Wait a minute. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE? Forget for a moment the finding that the Prescott Justice Court has jurisdiction over me, which it does not… DOMESTIC VIOLENCE??? The court found reasonable cause to believe that I may commit or have committed an act of Domestic Violence against Robin and/or Mary Frances Causey? By Arizona law, that is absolutely impossible, as I am not, nor have I ever been in a romantic relationship with Robin and/or Mary Frances Causey!
How does Arizona define “Domestic Violence”? Glad you asked.
13-3601. Domestic violence; definition; classification; sentencing option; arrest and procedure for violation; weapon seizure
A. “Domestic violence” means any act that is a dangerous crime against children as defined in section 13-705 or an offense prescribed in section 13-1102, 13-1103, 13-1104, 13-1105, 13-1201, 13-1202, 13-1203, 13-1204, 13-1302, 13-1303, 13-1304, 13-1406, 13-1502, 13-1503, 13-1504, 13-1602 or 13-2810, section 13-2904, subsection A, paragraph 1, 2, 3 or 6, section 13-2910, subsection A, paragraph 8 or 9, section 13-2915, subsection A, paragraph 3 or section 13-2916, 13-2921, 13-2921.01, 13-2923, 13-3019, 13-3601.02 or 13-3623, if any of the following applies:
1. The relationship between the victim and the defendant is one of marriage or former marriage or of persons residing or having resided in the same household.
2. The victim and the defendant have a child in common.
3. The victim or the defendant is pregnant by the other party.
4. The victim is related to the defendant or the defendant’s spouse by blood or court order as a parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, brother or sister or by marriage as a parent-in-law, grandparent-in-law, stepparent, step-grandparent, stepchild, step-grandchild, brother-in-law or sister-in-law.
5. The victim is a child who resides or has resided in the same household as the defendant and is related by blood to a former spouse of the defendant or to a person who resides or who has resided in the same household as the defendant.
6. The relationship between the victim and the defendant is currently or was previously a romantic or sexual relationship. The following factors may be considered in determining whether the relationship between the victim and the defendant is currently or was previously a romantic or sexual relationship:
(a) The type of relationship.
(b) The length of the relationship.
(c) The frequency of the interaction between the victim and the defendant.
(d) If the relationship has terminated, the length of time since the termination.
None of the above definitions fit the relationship I have with Robin or Mary Frances Causey.
Let’s turn to the form that Robin filled out. The one filled out by Mary Frances is identical.
This paper contains out and out lies. For one thing, I am not a “stalker.” I was responding to a provocation by Robin Causey. I called and told him to remove my mother’s image from his Twitter account. He hung up on me. I tried to call back, but the phone just rang. I sent an e-mail — ONE E-MAIL — telling him to remove my mother’s image from his Twitter account. I did not contact him in any way shape or form after April 28.
Now, look at Question 3. He answered it correctly first. Then he changed his answer into a lie. I have never been charged or arrested for domestic violence. I have never requested a protective order. We know he’s talking about me, because he circled the word “defendant.”
Does “perjury” mean anything to anyone? He outright lied on this form, signed it under penalty of perjury. THAT IS PERJURY!
Also, Mary Frances Causey makes the same allegations, adding that I sent her an e-mail at her work address. That e-mail was not sent by me, it was not sent on my authority. She also lied about my being arrested for domestic violence and requesting protective orders. She also lies about the timing and number of phone calls. And she also signs under penalty of perjury.
One more point: Nowhere on any of these forms have I been “adjudicated” a harasser. The order makes no such claim. I am ordered to “not-contact” Robin or Mary Frances Causey to keep me from “committing domestic abuse” against them, which I couldn’t commit if I wanted to as I do not fit the definition for being ABLE to “domestically abuse” them.
So no, Hoge maintains the sole distinction of winning a court case where a judge who had no idea what he was talking about said I harassed him. This pair of orders from The Causeys does no such thing.
It does make them guilty of perjury, however.
Apparently that’s not a crime anymore
The post Robin and Mary Frances Causey: Perjurers? appeared first on Patriot-Ombudsman.